--- title: "9 Steps to Handling Suspicions of Cheating in Tech Hiring | CoderPad" description: "Learn more about 9 Steps to Handling Suspicions of Cheating in Tech Hiring from CoderPad." canonical: "https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/handling-suspicions-of-cheating-tech-hiring/" last_modified: "2026-04-15 16:12:57" --- [Back to blog](https://coderpad.io/blog/) # 9 Steps to Handling Suspicions of Cheating in Tech Hiring December 5, 2024 4 Minute Read By Nathalie Figuière [Hiring Developers](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/) When cheating is suspected, act carefully. Investigate thoroughly without jumping to conclusions. Respectfully engage with the candidate and stick to the facts. Use data to guide decisions and refine your approach for the future. Learn from every case to strengthen your system. What does that look like step-by-step? Read on. ## Step 1: Stay objective and open-minded Avoid jumping to conclusions based on initial suspicions or single indicators. Any one indicator of unusual behavior is not necessarily enough to label a candidate as a cheater. > “Some engineers, being introverted, might not feel comfortable being on camera for the first interview. I wouldn’t take this as a red flag indicating cheating. Instead, focus on being engaged and ensuring the candidate can walk you through their solution in real time.” Nathan Sutter, CoderPad VP of Engineering ## Step 2: Gather and validate evidence After identifying suspicious behavior, make sure you dig deeper and get all of the facts. You could: - If your system has flagged excessive copy and paste, cross-check the candidate’s work against public solutions or AI-generated outputs to identify similarities. - Code search engines: GitHub, Stack Overflow, or Codewars - AI detection tools: Turnitin, Copyleaks, or GPTZero - Commonly used generative AI tools: ChatGPT or GitHub Copilot - Cross-check your candidate submissions internally, looking for similar code, patterns or mistakes. - Review digital monitoring data (e.g., screen recordings, activity logs, localization information, time stamps) to pinpoint anomalies. - If necessary, manually review the candidate’s code. - If possible, involve multiple reviewers (e.g., technical leads) to validate findings and minimize bias. Note: tools like CoderPad allow you to anonymize candidates during the screening process. This ensures that your initial investigation is based on evidence, rather than bias. You can then reveal a candidate’s identity if and when you decide to take action. ## Step 3: Initiate a constructive conversation Engage the candidate in a non-confrontational discussion: Highlight specific areas of concern and ask them to explain their reasoning. Avoid accusatory language; seek clarification instead. For example: “Can you walk me through how you approached this problem?” > “Curiosity will get you further than assumptions. Ask for explanations. Seek understanding without instant judgment. And see what you find out.” Amanda Richardson, CEO of CoderPad ## Step 4: Test real-time problem-solving If the candidate insists that your suspicions have no grounds, offer the candidate a second chance to demonstrate their abilities. Depending on their context within the hiring process, you could suggest: - A proctored follow-up assessment or coding exercise - A live coding interview. You could use this time to work on collaborative coding exercises that are specific to the role and your business. You could also review the candidate’s initial code, asking follow-up questions. ## Step 5: Pause, before making a decision Take a moment to step back, review the evidence and ask yourself the following questions: - What actually happened? - Why? - Does this class as cheating? - Is there a way to move past this, or is the outcome a firm reject? When in doubt, speak with other hiring professionals or colleagues within your organization to gather insights and compare actions taken in similar situations. > 🔖 Related read: [Four questions to guide your cheating prevention strategy (incl. What does “cheating” mean for your organization?)](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/how-effective-is-your-cheating-prevention-strategy-a-self-assessment-guide/) ## Step 6: Document and flag the incident Once you decide that you have sufficient evidence and perspective to label behavior as cheating: - Record all findings, including suspicious activity and follow-up interactions, for transparency. - Flag the candidate internally (so as to adjust scoring, alert other team members, etc.) - Within CoderPad Screen, for example, if you determine that a candidate has cheated on a particular question, you can mark the offending question by ticking the “Candidate cheated on this exercise” checkbox. Checking this box will remove points for the exercise and add a filter to the candidate. Additionally, in your dashboard, you’ll see a “Cheated” notification next to the candidate’s name. - Ensure you are adhering to any formal policies or systems for reporting and dealing with cheating. ## Step 7: Provide clear feedback to candidates Communicate your findings to the candidate respectfully and professionally: - Explain why their behavior conflicts with company values. - Emphasize the importance of integrity in future applications. - Be able to justify any actions or decisions by matching them to the level or type of cheating suspected. You should be able to explain precisely what behavior you consider cheating (for example, using someone else’s solution “verbatim”, and not being able to answer follow-up questions on said solution) and why. ## Step 8: Review content and manage leaks - Take the time to review your assessment content, try to identify any recurring themes or formats prone to cheating attempts. Take a critical look at your content and update any questions that aren’t relevant, relatable and realistic. - If the suspicious behavior involves leaked content: - Update or refresh compromised questions to maintain fairness for future candidates. - Report leaked material through proper legal channels, such as a DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedown requests. ## Step 9: Review your anti-cheating strategy See every “cheating case” as an opportunity to improve and adjust your approach to cheating. Analyze how the cheating occurred, identify gaps in your process, and collaborate with your team to refine tools and questions. ## Subscribe for more CoderPad insights ## Trending Articles Previous slide Next slide [Hiring Developers ## “Anti-Cheat” Candidate Communication Templates Transparency builds trust and deters cheating. Share what candidates need to know: process details, timelines, and assessment formats (how and what are you trying to evaluate?). Keep critical elements private to maintain integrity. Note: It may seem obvious, but remember to always share the same information with every potential hire. You want to set all […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/anti-cheat-candidate-communication-templates/) [Hiring Developers ## 18 Features Your Tech Assessment Tool Should Have to Prevent Cheating This article is an overview of “anti-cheat” features that can help you prevent, detect and mitigate cheating attempts within your candidate assessment process. Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/18-features-your-tech-assessment-tool-should-have-to-prevent-cheating/) [Hiring Developers ## Cheating Prevention in Technical Interviews: Balancing Hiring Integrity & Candidate Experience How do you balance looking after candidates with looking after the organization? Candidate experience with hiring integrity? Can you build a technical recruitment process that ticks both boxes? Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/cheating-prevention-in-technical-interviews-balancing-hiring-integrity-candidate-experience/) [Hiring Developers ## Hot Takes on Hiring: “AI Fluency” Is a Myth Our CEO, Amanda Richardson, and our Head of Product, Frank Hauben, can’t agree on anything else. We put Amanda and Frank on camera, handed them five spicy hot takes about AI in hiring, and told them not to sit on the fence. They sat on the fence anyway. Here’s what they actually fought about. Amanda […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/hot-takes-on-hiring-ai-fluency-is-a-myth/) [Hiring Developers ## 5 Unfiltered Takes on AI That Engineering Leaders Actually Believe We put a room full of senior engineering leaders together, took away the slides, added beer, and asked them to say the thing they’d never put in a LinkedIn post. No PR-approved talking points, no vendor gloss, just people who ship for a living telling the truth about what AI is doing inside their orgs […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/5-unfiltered-takes-on-ai-that-engineering-leaders-actually-believe/) [Hiring Developers ## Your Developer Interview Loop Is a Year Old. Is It Still Finding Your Best Candidates? A YC-backed founder called me last week with some good questions. His 20-person startup hadn’t hired an engineer in over a year. Now they’re opening reqs again, and instead of just dusting off the old loop, he wanted to understand how interviews had changed and if candidates were ready for AI interviews. His process — […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/your-developer-interview-loop-is-a-year-old-is-it-still-finding-your-best-candidates/) [Hiring Developers ## AI Fluency Is the New Technical Skill. Is Your Hiring Process Ready? Artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed software development. Developers are no longer working in isolation, writing every line of code from memory. AI has become part of the engineering workflow, helping developers brainstorm approaches, generate boilerplate code, and debug complex issues. The question isn’t whether engineers are using AI. It’s how effectively they’re using it. Hiring […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/ai-fluency-is-the-new-technical-skill-is-your-hiring-process-ready/) [Hiring Developers ## AI Didn’t Kill Entry Level Hiring. Bad Screening Did. For the last two years, the narrative has been loud, confident, and mostly wrong: AI is coming for entry level engineering jobs. The story goes something like this: If AI can write code, summarize docs, generate tests, and debug basic issues, why would companies still hire junior engineers? It sounds logical. It is also incomplete. […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/ai-didnt-kill-entry-level-hiring-bad-screening-did/) [Hiring Developers ## The Resume Is Dead. Most Teams Just Haven’t Admitted It Yet. Resumes made sense when applying for a job took real effort. That era is over. AI lets candidates apply to hundreds of roles in the time it once took to write a single cover letter. Employer-side AI systems process the flood. The result is a hiring funnel built almost entirely on artificial signals, where the […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/the-resume-is-dead-most-teams-just-havent-admitted-it-yet/) [Hiring Developers ## Is Your Technical Hiring Process Screening Out Great Engineers? The short answer: Many technical hiring processes are doing the latter. High-friction interview loops, live coding under observation, and AI-restrictive assessments are measuring interview performance, not job performance. The fix isn’t rebuilding from scratch — it’s auditing whether your process measures engineering capability or something else entirely. If you attended our recent webinar with CoderPad […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/is-your-technical-hiring-process-screening-out-great-engineers/) [Hiring Developers ## Junior Developers Are Your Strategic Advantage—If You Can Actually Evaluate Them Campus recruiting season arrives the same way every year: hundreds of applications, a narrow window, and a process that was never designed for this much volume or this much pressure. Meanwhile, the definition of “technical skill” is actively shifting—AI-polished resumes have made traditional screening nearly meaningless, and the skills that predict junior developer success look […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/junior-developers-are-your-strategic-advantage-if-you-can-actually-evaluate-them/) [Hiring Developers ## Your Hiring Process Is Losing You Top Talent. Before They Ever Interview! Here’s a hard truth most TA leaders don’t want to admit: your hiring process is screening for the wrong thing. Not skills. Not judgment. Not potential. It’s screening for the ability to interview well. And those two things have almost nothing to do with each other. We sat down with recruiting experts Cammas Freeman, Phil […] Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/your-hiring-process-is-losing-you-top-talent-before-they-ever-interview/) ## Hire with confidence. See why engineering teams trust CoderPad to evaluate developers with realistic, AI-ready hiring workflows. [Request a demo](https://coderpad.io/sales/)