---
title: "Cheating Prevention in Technical Interviews: Balancing Hiring Integrity & Candidate Experience | CoderPad"
description: "How do you balance looking after candidates with looking after the organization? Candidate experience with hiring integrity? Can you build a technical recruitment process that ticks both boxes?"
canonical: "https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/cheating-prevention-in-technical-interviews-balancing-hiring-integrity-candidate-experience/"
last_modified: "2026-04-15 16:12:57"
---
[Back to blog](https://coderpad.io/blog/)

# Cheating Prevention in Technical Interviews: Balancing Hiring Integrity & Candidate Experience

October 28, 2024 9 Minute Read

By Nathalie Figuière

[Hiring Developers](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/)

Imagine a sound mixer. A large desk covered in sliders for each input channel. Dial up drums; dial down vocals, and so on, until you find the right balance.

Recruitment can feel like that. TA leaders are the DJ, deciding what to balance to build a hiring function that’s both efficient and effective.

- Attract enough applications… but not so many you’re buried.
- Screen applicants down… but don’t be so rigorous you miss great people.
- Prioritize time-to-hire… but protect quality of hire too.
- Standardize processes… but don’t treat candidates like cattle.

As [the cheating conversation has exploded](https://coderpad.io/blog/interviewing/qa-musings-of-a-ceo-on-tech-interviews-cheating-and-ai/), one more slider is on most technical recruiters’ mixing desk:

- Protect the hiring process from cheating… but also protect candidate experience.

In other words, how do you balance looking after candidates with looking after the organization? Candidate experience with hiring integrity? Can you build a technical recruitment process that ticks both boxes?

The answer is yes, and we’ll share some practical ways to do it.

But the opportunity’s bigger than that. Because candidate experience isn’t just a priority to balance. Great CX is actually your best strategic lever to stop cheating in its tracks.

That’s a revolutionary idea, because it means you don’t have to backburner CX to frontburner integrity. And instead, can build an engaging, high-performance recruitment function that takes the cheating issue off the table.

## Let’s talk about developers cheating on technical tests

GenAI frog-marching across the world and remote working momentum have both opened new doors for cheating, making hiring integrity a hot-hot-hot topic.

([Business Insider reports](https://www.businessinsider.com/how-ai-can-catch-fraudulent-cheating-job-candidates-in-tech-2022-6?op=1) that 10% of tech candidates attempt to cheat during hiring, for example. Ouch).

### Cheating is a high-stakes problem

At best, cheating wastes everyone’s time and money. At worst, cheating imperils hiring decision-making. You might think you interviewed Kylie, but actually you interviewed Kylie’s friend Anusha. Or Reddit.

Hopefully when Kylie turns up, she’s relatively capable. Perhaps she felt pressured to cheat because of the intensity of the job market, for example. So maybe she’s not a great culture fit – but hiring her doesn’t derail the business.

>

🔖 Related read: [Why do candidates really cheat?](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/why-do-candidates-cheat-uncovering-the-root-causes-and-how-to-address-them/)

But worst-case scenario, Kylie’s miles off the pace. And her lackluster coding skills escalate into embarrassing, time-consuming, costly issues. And then there’s the whole fire-rehire mountain too.

(Even more worst-case, the [FBI warns of cybercriminals cheating to secure jobs](https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/fbi-beware-deepfakes-remote-jobs/) that grant exposure to confidential data. Try explaining that one to your employees and customers.)

So how do you stop prospective devs from cheating their way into a job? Let’s start with understanding the scope of the problem.

### How do technical candidates cheat during recruitment?

The answer’s complicated, because one person’s cheating is another person’s resourcefulness. But let’s review the most common “cheating” touchpoints:

- Jacked-up resumes

You probably have an intuitive sense of what cheating on a resume looks like. But unpick that slightly and it’s more nuanced.

- Hiring a professional resume writer

Attitudes have evolved but for many traditionalists, any external help is “cheating”. Even if the role has nothing to do with the skill of resume writing.

- Using AI to create a resume

[46% of 1000 jobseekers recently admitted to using ChatGPT](https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/technology/job-seekers-cheating-use-chatgpt-to-craft-resumes-cover-letters) to write cover letters or resumes – and 59% were hired. But then 11% were rejected when the employer learned they’d used ChatGPT. So is using ChatGPT smart, or dishonest?

- ‘White fonting’ terms to trick algorithms
![A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-5.png) ([Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/resumes/comments/15jxc4m/can_you_cheat_the_system_by_tricking_the_algorithm/))

Is tricking the algorithm cheating – or pragmatic? What about if the candidate only white-fonts skills they actually have?

- Tailoring resumes to the job description

Is this different from white fonting? On the one hand, candidates highlighting points from your JD shows they’re attentive and engaged. But what if they use AI to parse job descriptions and tailor their CV en-masse? Where’s the line?

- Exaggerating – or flat-out lying about – experience and skills

This probably feels like obvious cheating. But is there much difference between exaggerating and using a professional writer to shine the best possible light?

- Copy-and-paste code

Google. Reddit. ChatGPT. Copilot. Glassdoor. Stack Overflow.

There are heaps of places candidates can, theoretically, “cheat”. But using those channels doesn’t automatically mean a candidate is cheating.

- Are they searching Google for a reminder because they haven’t used a certain language for a while?
- Are they using Copilot to generate ideas but editing code using their skills, judgment and experience?
- Are they copy-and-pasting but planning to test and codebug from that foundation?
- Or are they copying complex answers verbatim, because they don’t understand any better?

You might consider all of these cheating. But there’s a strong argument that the first two or three are pragmatic, efficient ways developers solve problems on-the-job.

Our [State of Tech Hiring 2024](https://coderpad.io/survey-reports/coderpad-and-codingame-state-of-tech-hiring-2024/) report found that 70% of developers think AI will help reduce their workload, for example. So [can we really say candidates using AI is “cheating”?](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/genai-for-technical-hiring-friend-or-foe/)

![A white background with black text Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-3.png) ([Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/1fylyll/how_do_you_tell_if_a_candidate_is_cheating_on_a/))

And another fly in the ointment:

- What if a candidate isn’t copy-and-pasting… not because they’re a good developer, but because they memorized everything?

Lots of recruiters wouldn’t consider that cheating. In fact, lots of technical hiring processes still (inadvertently) interview specifically for memorization. [But is a good memory really the major skill for success?](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/dos-and-donts-cheating-prevention-nathan-sutter/) We’ll leave that with you…

![A screenshot of a social media post Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-1.png) ([Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/1fylyll/how_do_you_tell_if_a_candidate_is_cheating_on_a/))
- Asking a friend

This is more cut-and-dried – but not totally. Candidates might cheat by:

- Having someone else complete assessments
- Having someone off-screen for live interviews
- Being fed answers through an earpiece
- Bait-and-switching – one person interviews but another turns up
![A screenshot of a social media post Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-2.png) ([Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/18dv9o7/is_cheating_on_technical_interviews_common/))

But what about… calling a more senior developer for an opinion? Arguably cheating, but also arguably exactly what they’d do on-the-job.

### What does cheating look like for you?

The point of these examples isn’t to make you worry even more about cheating. It’s to show that cheating is a spectrum. Ask fifty technical hiring managers what cheating looks like and you’ll get fifty different answers.

Cheating also varies by industry, role, location and seniority.

[David Marr](https://www.linkedin.com/in/dmarr/) – Principal Technical Sourcer for Coalfire – points out that cheating practices are often more common for contract roles than full-time, for example.

And CoderPad’s VP of Engineering, [Nathan Sutter](https://www.linkedin.com/in/nathansutter/), says verbatim copy-paste answers are most common for graduate and junior roles because questions are most likely algorithmic.

>

🎬 Webinar: [Candidate Cheating vs. Candidate Experience in IT Recruitment](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZO2rLFpbtRc&ab_channel=CoderPad)

Preventing cheating starts with defining ‘cheating’ in your own context. Then you can explore ways to address it.

## Practical ways to prevent and detect cheating

Once you’ve got your arms around the problem, you can pinpoint practical ways to mitigate. That’s where the right tooling comes in.

CoderPad’s platform empowers you to run coding assessments and [collaborative technical interviews](https://coderpad.io/platform/coding-interviews/), with a [heap of in-built anti-cheating features](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/18-features-your-tech-assessment-tool-should-have-to-prevent-cheating/) you can toggle on if you need them:

### Prevention’s better than cure

- Question randomisation to mitigate the risk of question sharing
- Question timers to prevent searching for answers
- Copy/paste limitations to control when and how candidates copy and paste
- AI content testing to regularly update, test, and safeguard content library
- Easy-build custom-code exercises to create more cheat-proof tests
- Gamified coding exercises that are much harder to submit to AI for help

### Detecting possible cheating

- Code playback to see how candidates wrote their code
- IDE exit detection to know if/when candidates left their test
- Copy/paste tracking to spot if code might’ve originated elsewhere
- Plagiarism detection to spot if exact code is reused
- AI follow-up questions to check candidates’ understanding of code
- Candidate flagging to identity possible suspicious behaviour
- Location tracking to check candidates are based where they say
- Anomaly alerts for unusual candidate activity or performance
- Test performance tracking to detect unusual improvement on retakes
- Webcam proctoring and AI analysis to flag suspicious behaviour

>

[CoderPad Screen](https://coderpad.io/platform/technical-screening/) makes a heap of sense if you’re struggling to get great resumes over to engineers. Especially if you’re worried about the integrity of applications.

Recruitment-led resume screening is often a painful bottleneck because it’s hard to sort the diamonds from the rough amid buckets of technical nuance. (And the rise of AI-CVs). Managers end up wasting time interviewing candidates who don’t have basic technical skills, causing frustration and breeding internal resentment.

![A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/img_671f7a6e8fd9a.png)

Instead, CoderPad Screen empowers you to send candidates a short, gamified coding assessment that’s scored to your criteria. It’s better for everyone: Recruiters screen applications much faster and with way more confidence. Hiring managers only spend time interviewing the best candidates. Developers can show off their true skills in an engaging, fun way.

[Learn more about how CoderPad can help mitigate cheating in your tech hiring process.](https://coderpad.io/features/cheating-prevention/)

But let’s dig deeper into why you shouldn’t just switch-on all these features and be done with it.

## Addressing cheating needs a bow and arrow, not a scattergun

[McKinsey says](https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/tech-talent-tectonics-ten-new-realities-for-finding-keeping-and-developing-talent) candidate experience should be one of technical recruiters’ biggest strategic priorities. And no wonder. A great candidate experience can:

- Boost your employer brand, making it easier to attract top tech talent
- Improve candidate engagement and ease onboarding runways
- Increase offer acceptance, so more great devs sign on the dotted line
- Reduce costs by increasing recruitment efficiency

But taking a catch-all approach to mitigating cheating is directly counter to your candidate experience goals.

Imagine you switch on total copy/paste blocking for all candidates. Yes, that’ll stop candidates copying answers verbatim from elsewhere. But it’ll also stop candidates checking and copying a piece of code from Stack Overflow, to avoid mistakes and save time. It comes back to your definitions: is that cheating?

![A screenshot of a social media post Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-4.png) ([Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/1fylyll/how_do_you_tell_if_a_candidate_is_cheating_on_a/))

Either way, serious developers aren’t likely to take well to sweeping prohibitions that feel arbitrary and ridiculous. And no adult likes being treated like a child.

The upshot is: a fire-blanket approach to preventing cheating smothers everything – including your best candidates. That’s never ideal, but it’s especially not ideal given [the ongoing developer shortage.](https://devops.com/addressing-the-developer-skills-gap/)

Tech recruiters need to balance preventing cheating with prioritizing candidate experience. The best way to do that is with a measured, pragmatic, case-by-case approach.

But there’s also another, even bigger opportunity here. Because candidate experience isn’t just a priority to juggle. Candidate experience can actually be your biggest lever to help prevent cheating in the first place.

## Candidate experience ⬆️, cheating ⬇️

[Why do candidates cheat?](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/why-do-candidates-cheat-uncovering-the-root-causes-and-how-to-address-them/) Because they’re unskilled and want to convince you otherwise? Sure, occasionally. Some are desperate to get experience. A few subscribe to the ‘fake it ‘til you make it’ philosophy.

But mostly, candidates are skilled. But often they:

- Lack confidence in a competitive job market
- Lack confidence about what’s expected
- Worry they’re expected to have memorized everything
- Are frustrated at boring, repetitive, generic, bland evaluations
- Are sick and tired of jumping through arbitrary hoops
- Don’t buy-into the opportunity because the interview tells them nothing

A great candidate experience can solve all those issues, to:

- Give candidates clarity about your expectations and hiring criteria
- Put candidates at ease by telling them what the hiring process involves
- Respect candidates’ time, with engaging, contextual, modern evaluations
- Help candidates excel with realistic true-to-job exercises (not memory tests)
- Move faster, with processes designed to skyrocket internal efficiency
- Uncover candidates’ true abilities with deep follow-up questions
- Help candidates assess whether you’re the right fit for them

When you build a technical recruitment process like that, cheat rates plummet. Because you’re dismantling the reasons most candidates cheat in the first place. You’re building a process that’s respectful, engaging, empathetic, and valuable for everyone involved.

![A screenshot of a social media post Description automatically generated](https://coderpad.io/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-6.png)

Yes, you’ll probably still get the 1% who were always going to cheat anyway. That’s why you choose tooling with [comprehensive cheating prevention functionality](https://coderpad.io/features/cheating-prevention/).

But instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, you also build a process that gives space for technical superstars to shine. And then you can hire them!

Are you ready to update your tech hiring process and ensure you’re preventing candidates from cheating? [Request a demo](https://coderpad.io/sales/) with our team today!

## Subscribe for more CoderPad insights

## Trending Articles

Previous slide Next slide [Hiring Developers

## 18 Features Your Tech Assessment Tool Should Have to Prevent Cheating

This article is an overview of “anti-cheat” features that can help you prevent, detect and mitigate cheating attempts within your candidate assessment process.

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/18-features-your-tech-assessment-tool-should-have-to-prevent-cheating/) [Hiring Developers

## “Don’t Expect Candidates to Have Everything Memorized”, the Dos and Don’ts of Cheating Prevention With Nathan Sutter

Sure, you want to prevent cheating. But you also want to feel good about your hiring process. So how do you do that?

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/dos-and-donts-cheating-prevention-nathan-sutter/) [Hiring Developers

## Best Practices for Proctoring in Technical Assessments Without Compromising Candidate Experience

If you haven’t learned that hiring developers is like balancing above a pool with sharks on your left side and electric eels on the right, then consider these two experiences when it comes to cheating and proctored tests: Evidence #1 In high-volume recruiting situations, I have seen people do the actual tech assessments and then […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/best-practices-for-proctoring-in-technical-assessments-without-compromising-candidate-experience/) [Hiring Developers

## Hot Takes on Hiring: “AI Fluency” Is a Myth

Our CEO, Amanda Richardson, and our Head of Product, Frank Hauben, can’t agree on anything else. We put Amanda and Frank on camera, handed them five spicy hot takes about AI in hiring, and told them not to sit on the fence. They sat on the fence anyway. Here’s what they actually fought about. Amanda […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/hot-takes-on-hiring-ai-fluency-is-a-myth/) [Hiring Developers

## 5 Unfiltered Takes on AI That Engineering Leaders Actually Believe

We put a room full of senior engineering leaders together, took away the slides, added beer, and asked them to say the thing they’d never put in a LinkedIn post. No PR-approved talking points, no vendor gloss, just people who ship for a living telling the truth about what AI is doing inside their orgs […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/5-unfiltered-takes-on-ai-that-engineering-leaders-actually-believe/) [Hiring Developers

## Your Developer Interview Loop Is a Year Old. Is It Still Finding Your Best Candidates?

A YC-backed founder called me last week with some good questions. His 20-person startup hadn’t hired an engineer in over a year. Now they’re opening reqs again, and instead of just dusting off the old loop, he wanted to understand how interviews had changed and if candidates were ready for AI interviews. His process — […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/your-developer-interview-loop-is-a-year-old-is-it-still-finding-your-best-candidates/) [Hiring Developers

## AI Fluency Is the New Technical Skill. Is Your Hiring Process Ready?

Artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed software development. Developers are no longer working in isolation, writing every line of code from memory. AI has become part of the engineering workflow, helping developers brainstorm approaches, generate boilerplate code, and debug complex issues. The question isn’t whether engineers are using AI. It’s how effectively they’re using it. Hiring […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/ai-fluency-is-the-new-technical-skill-is-your-hiring-process-ready/) [Hiring Developers

## AI Didn’t Kill Entry Level Hiring. Bad Screening Did.

For the last two years, the narrative has been loud, confident, and mostly wrong: AI is coming for entry level engineering jobs. The story goes something like this: If AI can write code, summarize docs, generate tests, and debug basic issues, why would companies still hire junior engineers? It sounds logical. It is also incomplete. […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/ai-didnt-kill-entry-level-hiring-bad-screening-did/) [Hiring Developers

## The Resume Is Dead. Most Teams Just Haven’t Admitted It Yet.

Resumes made sense when applying for a job took real effort. That era is over. AI lets candidates apply to hundreds of roles in the time it once took to write a single cover letter. Employer-side AI systems process the flood. The result is a hiring funnel built almost entirely on artificial signals, where the […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/the-resume-is-dead-most-teams-just-havent-admitted-it-yet/) [Hiring Developers

## Is Your Technical Hiring Process Screening Out Great Engineers?

The short answer: Many technical hiring processes are doing the latter. High-friction interview loops, live coding under observation, and AI-restrictive assessments are measuring interview performance, not job performance. The fix isn’t rebuilding from scratch — it’s auditing whether your process measures engineering capability or something else entirely. If you attended our recent webinar with CoderPad […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/is-your-technical-hiring-process-screening-out-great-engineers/) [Hiring Developers

## Junior Developers Are Your Strategic Advantage—If You Can Actually Evaluate Them

Campus recruiting season arrives the same way every year: hundreds of applications, a narrow window, and a process that was never designed for this much volume or this much pressure. Meanwhile, the definition of “technical skill” is actively shifting—AI-polished resumes have made traditional screening nearly meaningless, and the skills that predict junior developer success look […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/junior-developers-are-your-strategic-advantage-if-you-can-actually-evaluate-them/) [Hiring Developers

## Your Hiring Process Is Losing You Top Talent. Before They Ever Interview!

Here’s a hard truth most TA leaders don’t want to admit: your hiring process is screening for the wrong thing. Not skills. Not judgment. Not potential. It’s screening for the ability to interview well. And those two things have almost nothing to do with each other. We sat down with recruiting experts Cammas Freeman, Phil […]

Read the post](https://coderpad.io/blog/hiring-developers/your-hiring-process-is-losing-you-top-talent-before-they-ever-interview/)

## Hire with confidence.

See why engineering teams trust CoderPad to evaluate developers with realistic, AI-ready hiring workflows.

[Request a demo](https://coderpad.io/sales/)